Human philosophy is addicted to false dichotomies. We often make sense of the world by making dangerous distinctions. We reduce the inherent complexity of life to create simple either/or realities.
Maybe you have heard, “Either support this new law or you’re advocating for chaos.” “Either you believe in science or reject the facts for your personal opinion.” “Either you support handouts to the poor or leave them to starve.” Each of these statements ignores more nuanced approaches. They try to create two exclusive categories with no other available options for how you conceptualize or engage in the world.
Simple dichotomies can help us see distinct variables to consider and assimilate, but they can also be used to control us. Perpetrators of either/or propositions are often trying to push an agenda. They want to force you into supporting their party or preference. Or set you up to be an easy enemy to take down and demean. Jesus’ opponents employed this strategy repeatedly.
Maybe you have heard, “Either support this new law or you’re advocating for chaos.” “Either you believe in science or reject the facts for your personal opinion.” “Either you support handouts to the poor or leave them to starve.” Each of these statements ignores more nuanced approaches. They try to create two exclusive categories with no other available options for how you conceptualize or engage in the world.
Simple dichotomies can help us see distinct variables to consider and assimilate, but they can also be used to control us. Perpetrators of either/or propositions are often trying to push an agenda. They want to force you into supporting their party or preference. Or set you up to be an easy enemy to take down and demean. Jesus’ opponents employed this strategy repeatedly.
RSS Feed
