Reenacting the Way
Join the BOOK conversation on Facebook
  • Book
  • Video
  • Author
  • Reviews
  • B.IQ Test
  • Seminar
    • Watch Bible Seminar
  • Contact
  • Blog

Reformation day: The birth of church denominations and mass Bible misinterpretation

11/1/2013

5 Comments

 
Picture
I often open lectures in front of new audiences with the question: what is the most dangerous religious holiday on the Calendar? After a few misguided guesses about burning yourself with fireworks on Independence Day, I give a hint. It's in October. Without fail, someone reluctantly whispers "Halloween." They fold their arms, lean back in their seat and wait for some rant about the gouls and goblins. But that's not my point.

Now I'm no fan of Halloween. Personally I start listening to Christmas music in September and wish all the costume shops would stop taking over perfectly vacant storefronts every autumn. I find no redemptive value in giving my neighbors opportunity to dress up as witches and zombies to scare my young and impressionable children into a month of nightmares. That said, Halloween is nowhere near as dangerous as the Protestant holiday on October 31, Reformation Day.

The Church Divided and Always Dividing

The very term "reformation" in Reformation Day can be misleading. How? Martin Luther and other reformers may have intended to reform the church. But they failed. They ended up dividing it.

The sound of Church Division Day doesn't have the same ring. That's why those who have created, led, and joined splinter denominations of the Protestant church stick with the name Reformation Day on the church calendar. But if you've ever wondered when the church started rapidly dividing, look at the overview of denominational splits in the flow chart below.
Picture
Historically, the "Great Schism" of the church points to the split between the eastern Orthodox and western Roman Catholic churches around 1000 AD. However, the rapid proliferation of church divisions actually begins in the 16th Century with the Reformation. The Reformation not the "Great Schism" caused the present-day 33,000 Christian denominations to form in the following 500 years.

When you translate the Reformation's Latin motto reformata et semper reformanda ("Reformed and always being reformed") into its practical consequences, it becomes: "Divided and always being divided." I've never heard anyone quote it that way, but it is the natural outcome. 

Why is that the case?

Mass Bible Misinterpretation

The driver behind Protestant church divisions is the shared belief in the private interpretation of Scripture. For 1,500 years of the church's life, Jesus followers received the tradition of the prophets and apostles through appointed leaders. Following Jesus did not require the personal reading and study of the Bible. Can you imagine that? Personal Bible reading is a brand new development in the last quarter of the Christian faith.

Why the change? The Reformers recognized the problem of centralizing authority in a select group of priests, bishops and popes. So they took action. Or as I would say, they overreacted. Martin Luther launched a mission to get a Bible in every person's language and home. If everyone had a Bible to study, then Church leaders could no longer make up bad ideas and say, "The Bible says so." There would be accountability. The problem is: now everyone could make up bad ideas and say, "The Bible says so."


The unintended negative consequences of putting a Bible in everyone's hands are felt everyday. Instead of clergy having the exclusive right to interpret the Bible however they choose, now every person with a Bible can make up their own faith. And we have. 
Now every person with a Bible can make up their own faith. And we have.
We all claim to be "biblical." We claim to "actually" believe what "the Bible says." But so few of us have been extensively trained by time-tested and trusted teachers on how to handle the traditions of the prophets and apostles preserved in the Bible. So we divide among ourselves to no end to defend our personal opinions.

Proud Protestantism

You may be uncomfortable with my portrait of the Reformation. You may be asking: How could it be bad for everybody to have their own Bible? Isn't it a sacred and noble good to translate the Bible into every language so all people can read it? If by those questions you actually mean--isn't it good for all people to gain introduction to Jesus, then it is good. If you mean--everyone should read their Bible and determine its meaning between them and God, then I find it arrogant.

The apostle Paul made it clear that God appointed teachers and pastors and prophets to lead the community (Ephesians 4:11-13). He employed Jesus' same model of training young men like Timothy who would faithfully pass it on to the next generation (2 Timothy 2:2). We were not meant to inject Western individualism into the community of faith. "Me and Jesus and the Bible" is not all you need. God is building a community. All parts are essential, and not everyone is a part of those trained and gifted to interpret the Scriptures. I know it's hard to hear, but the "priesthood of all believers" doesn't mean we all have equal understanding of the Bible; it simply means we have equal access to God.

There is a healthy place between individualistic Protestantism that divides and elitist hierarchies that deceive. We must pursue it. Protestants must humbly relinquish their pride in personal Bible interpretation, knowing it has caused the majority of church splits. The more people have been given the chance to determine the meaning of the Bible for themselves, the more church divisions have accelerated in the last 500 years. 

We cannot blindly celebrate the success of Protestantism on Reformation Day. Unintentionally, it has crushed Jesus' dream for future believers "that they may all be one" (John 17:21). If you celebrated Reformation Day this past week, then please spend the next month learning how to more "accurately handle the word of truth" (2 Timothy 2:15). Please be careful not to use personal Bible interpretation to drive one more wedge between the family.
5 Comments
Stephen D Morrison link
3/2/2014 07:53:38 pm

Excellent thoughts! I appreciate your stance on this, and I agree with your conclusions. There has to be some way of navigating this divide. While being careful not to take away a Christian's right to think for themselves, there needs to be a higher value for teachers and scholars. Well said.

Reply
Paul link
3/6/2014 01:23:48 am

Thanks Stephen! Let's keep working together on this important task.

Reply
Rick T
10/8/2014 09:04:03 pm

I would be interested to know how they should have dealt with the false gospel and false teaching that they were seeking to reform and protect their flock from.

Salvation by grace through faith alone. Prayer to God through Jesus alone. Etc...

Reply
Matt
11/1/2014 12:08:42 pm

This is a sad revisionist view of history. Saying it's a bad thing for the common man to have access to the Word of God is one of the most un-Biblical things I've ever heard.
And If you want to correct your history a bit you might also note that Gutenberg and the printing press also are the same time as the Reformation and it was the first time in history that the common man could even afford to have a book/Bible in the first place. Not to mention illiteracy rates of the time (by the way Lutherans helped end that problem in Germany too if you remember Melancthon and kindergarten)
It's funny you talk about "Proud Protestants" but Lutherans still to this day don't want to be a separate church body they just want reforms to the one Holy catholic and Apostolic church.

Reply
Paul Penley link
11/26/2014 03:00:19 pm

Matt - I'm glad you took a few minutes to explore a tough reality we Protestants must engage thoughtfully. Your labels of "revisionist" history and "un-Biblical" blogging don't imply you want to discuss or learn. These terms are difficult in themselves since any reflection on history can be labeled "revisionist" insofar as it says anything different than one other person's vision. Any message or implication of a blog can be deemed "un-Biblical" if a single person's interpretation of "what the Bible says" disagrees. I am well aware of the Renaissance ideas driving the anti-authoritarian Reformers and the printing press making Luther's vision of everyone reading their own Bible possible. However, the fundamental issue is "private, authoritative interpretation of Scripture." Alister McGrath's book about the Protestant Revolution, entitled Christianity's Dangerous Idea, demonstrates this unifying value amidst the rapidly growing diversity of Protestant leaders (i.e., dividers). I do believe many church traditions (like the Lutherans you generalize) long for one united church, as long as that church follows their slant on all the Bible verses they use to form their priorities. Permitting everyone to decide what God is really all about with a Bible in hand does truly make unity a difficult matter because the Bible becomes a tool in the hands of a thousand crusaders.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    BUY the BOOKs

    Picture
    Picture

    Coming June 26.


    Author

    Paul Penley's training as a Bible scholar, life as a human being, and work as a philanthropic advisor overflows into this blog

    View my profile on LinkedIn
    Picture

    Top 5 Blogs

    1. Women Should Not Teach Men What?
    2. John Calvin Killed Rival Theologians
    3. Turning the Other Cheek
    4. I Wish You Were Cold or Hot, not Lukewarm
    5. When Heaven and Earth Passed Away
    Picture
    Picture

    Enter email address to receive monthly blogs:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Bible Interpretation Gone Wrong
    Faith Isn't Knowing Everything
    How To Follow Jesus
    How To Study The Bible
    Ministries Gone Wrong
    Narrative Theology
    The Character Life Demands

    Archives

    January 2021
    May 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.